REPEATED PRESSURE-RELATED CHROMATOGRAPHIC FAILURE DURING SALIVARY CORTISOL ANALYSIS BY LC-HRMS/MS: A LABORATORY CASE REPORT AND HYPOTHESIS-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • SR UMRAO Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • S ELANGOVAN Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • MS THARAMMAL Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • MR QURESHI Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • SHS MOHAMMED Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • MM ALAM Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • F ASHRAF Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • FU AMIN Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • MM KHAN Life Core Private Clinic LLC, Royal Group Headquarters (7th Floor), Al Salam Street, PO Box 63811, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64013/bbasr.v2026i1.141

Keywords:

LC-HRMS/MS, Orbitrap, PRM, salivary cortisol, column fouling, back-pressure, matrix effects, method robustness, sample preparation, root-cause analysis

Abstract

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the reference standard method for quantitatively measuring salivary cortisol, largely because of its high analytical specificity and sensitivity. However, saliva is a complex biological matrix that may compromise chromatographic robustness during routine testing. Here, we report a laboratory case of system back-pressure exceedance, chromatographic deterioration, and analytical column collapse during routine LC-HRMS/MS analysis of salivary cortisol using a commercially available sample preparation and analysis kit. Two columns used in assay analysis failed consecutively. Both columns were subjected to the same working conditions. Factors such as how the samples were injected, chromatograms, and the behaviour of the system were analyzed. Possible causes of failures were also evaluated based on the pressure and behaviour of the columns. The team also evaluated possible causes based on column pressure and behaviour. The review indicated that the matrix caused the failure. Poorly removed salivary mucins and other particles clogged the columns. Flow restriction caused retention time to vary. The columns became worn out because the phase failed to remain permanently fixed to the column. Failures occurred in two columns and suggested a limitation of the method regarding matrix interaction with LC-MS/MS. This occurred mainly when high-viscosity saliva samples were analyzed using UHPLC columns. Restrictions were noted particularly at the column inlet. It was recommended that columns be well protected and that preventive maintenance be performed to reduce column failures and loss of phase integrity. This is especially true in laboratories that analyze salivary cortisol using LC-MS/MS. The report presents a case study illustrating the types of column failures caused by matrix limitations in LC-MS/MS analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chiappin, S., Antonelli, G., Gatti, R., & De Palo, E. F. (2007). Saliva specimen: A new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clinica Chimica Acta, 383(1–2), 30–40.

Keevil, B. G. (2016). LC–MS/MS analysis of steroids in the clinical laboratory. Clinical Biochemistry, 49(13–14), 989–997.

Matuszewski, B. K., Constanzer, M. L.,&Chavez-Eng, C. M. (2003). Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC–MS/MS. Analytical Chemistry, 75(13), 3019–3030.

Mezzullo, M., Fanelli, F., Fazzini, A., Gambineri, A., Vicennati, V., Di Dalmazi, G., Pelusi, C., Mazza, R., Pagotto, U., & Pasquali, R. (2016). Validation of an LC–MS/MS salivary assay for glucocorticoid status assessment: Evaluation of the diurnal fluctuation of cortisol and cortisone and of their association within and between serum and saliva. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 163, 103–112.

Raff, H. (2009). Utility of salivary cortisol measurements in Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal insufficiency. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology&Metabolism, 94(10), 3647–3655.

Rodríguez-Cabo, T., Rodríguez, I., Ramil, M., & Cela, R. (2019). Sample clean-up strategies for complex biological matrices in LC–MS/MS analysis. Journal of Chromatography B, 1125, 121706.

Taylor, P. J. (2005). Matrix effects: The Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray–tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical Biochemistry, 38(4), 328–334.

Van Eeckhaut, A., Lanckmans, K., Sarre, S., Smolders, I., & Michotte, Y. (2009). Validation of bioanalytical LC–MS/MS assays: Evaluation of matrix effects. Journal of Chromatography B, 877(23), 2198–2207.

Vogeser, M., & Seger, C. (2008). A decade of HPLC–MS/MS in the routine clinical laboratory—Goals for further developments. Clinical Biochemistry, 41(9), 649–662.

Žuvela, P., Skoczylas, M., Liu, J. J., Baczek, T., Kaliszan, R., Wong, M. W., & Buszewski, B. (2019). Column characterization and selection systems in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Chemical Reviews, 119(6), 3674–3729.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-12

How to Cite

UMRAO, S., ELANGOVAN , S., THARAMMAL, M., QURESHI, M., MOHAMMED, S., ALAM, M., ASHRAF, F., AMIN, F., & KHAN, M. (2026). REPEATED PRESSURE-RELATED CHROMATOGRAPHIC FAILURE DURING SALIVARY CORTISOL ANALYSIS BY LC-HRMS/MS: A LABORATORY CASE REPORT AND HYPOTHESIS-DRIVEN ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research, 2026(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.64013/bbasr.v2026i1.141